Between the past & the future: Ministry Update February 2007

The previous week, I conducted two similar classes on writing forms. Though both consisted of very diverse groups of students, they share a similar concern – why the need to learn the various confusing writing forms? I wondered about this myself – why is the footnote done in this manner while the bibliography is done in that manner? Why the need to set the margin as such and such? Why indeed? But the years of learning, plus the many times of grading student papers, I have reached a conclusion. A standard writing format is important for the following reasons (though not comprehensive):
- it shows quality (if other organizations can strive for standardization, eg., the ISO certifications, why not the church? Aren’t we supposed to be the head and not the tail? (Deut. 28:13) We should be the one leading in excellence, not tailing far behind the world)
- we ought to present the best to God (if God takes us so seriously that He died for us, should we not take seriously everything He entrusted to us?)
- as we strive for (academic, especially) excellence, standardization exhibits professionalism
- God is a God of order, not confusion (1 Cor 14:33) – as such, a standard format is necessary

I’m presently studying the second last course to complete the credits required to fulfill my study program requirements. Please pray for me that as I complete the studies and work on my thesis, God will direct and lead me. I am truly enjoying ministry at MBTS. Probably because my temperament as a choleric-melancholy that makes “work” fun & fulfilling. I love having loads of tasks in my hands and in His own way, He speaks to me through this channel. I have not forgotten my mission nor my passion and calling. And I trust Him to take me to and through circumstances in order to mold me and prepare me for the ministry He is taking me to.

Differing from most Christians, the church is to me first universal before it is local. However, the view of the general Christian population will probably accept the church first as local before it is universal. Perhaps it is this differing perception that I find myself among a small distinct group of individuals who prefers ministering from a wider angle. What I mean is, seeing the universality of the church and ministering from that perspective. This include a, what I may address as “cross church effort” – meaning the coming together of Christians from various churches with a similar passion/conviction to serve in a ministry that seeks to honor God and bless His church. This is how I would define “Kingdom Perspective” – looking beyond each local church and seeking to glorify the Lord, pooling together efforts/talents/gifts with a common passion which is to grow the Kingdom of God. I believe the Great Commission (Matt. 28:18-20; Mark 16:15; Luke 24: 44-49; Acts 1:7-9; John 20:21) specify “ministry policy” – equip and go forth – and it is only when we obediently comply to this “policy” that the Lord will truly proper what is “at home.”

Luke 6:33 But seek first his kingdom and his righteousness, and all these things will be given to you as well.